Running Linux Workloads on POWER Reduces TCO
IBMers John F. Ryan and Susan Proietti Conti break down the costs of running Linux workloads on POWER versus x86.
By Susan Proietti Conti
John F. Ryan
Who could have predicted the success that Linux* would achieve when Linus Torvalds introduced its first release in 1991. Indeed, it could be argued that Linux has become the most popular OS on the planet given that it runs on virtually every compute platform in use today. Its ubiquitous and portable nature enables organizations everywhere and of every size to leverage open standards and open-source community collaboration while exploiting architecture-specific attributes. Increasingly, organizations are choosing the IBM Power Systems* platform over x86 to run their Linux workloads to gain dramatic IT cost savings.
Doing More With Fewer Cores
Both IBM POWER* processor- and x86-based servers have made performance improvements over time. However, data from multiple sources1 shows that while x86 servers may have increased in overall size, capacity, and system performance, the per core performance of x86 multicore CPU offerings has remained relatively flat. In contrast, the IBM POWER processor has increased its per core performance on average by 35% with each new generation or technology release.
For many Linux-based software packages, subscription and support licensing is typically priced per core (or socket). Reducing the number of required cores to run those packages can significantly decrease software costs. In a recent case study for a large European telecommunications company comparing Linux web application and database workloads on Skylake x86 blades and Linux on a Power System E980 server, analysis found that for every POWER9* core, the x86 solution required 10 Intel* Xeon Skylake cores. This core differential for the Power E980 solution would save the company $7 million over five years with 74% of those savings based on reductions in core-based licensing subscription and support costs for the systems software, web and database (Figure 1, below).
Floor Space and Electricity
Another advantage of Linux on POWER and its capability to do more work with fewer resources is observed when examining space and electrical costs2. The following case illustrates how a large genomics research facility was able to reduce its physical footprint from 89 Linux on x86 servers to four Linux on POWER9 AC922 NVLink enabled GPU systems. The space savings was 1,586 square feet or roughly 340 rack units, while annual electrical was reduced by 558,000 kilowatt hours, equating to an annual cost savings of $500,000.
Longer Lifecycles, Fewer Refreshes
The POWER architecture supports superior performance and lifecycle longevity for Linux workloads. Assessments performed by the IBM IT Economics team found that most POWER users refresh their servers once every four to five years while the customary refresh cycle for x86 users is once every three to four years. Over 10 years, that translates to a 33% lower refresh cycle for Linux on POWER than for Linux on x86. This results in decreased business disruptions and technology change-out costs such as planned outages, systems administration and labor, temporary parallel operation, and large step increases in software and hardware maintenance (Figure 2, below).
In the 2019 ITIC Global Reliability Survey, 88% of survey respondents indicated that the cost of a single hour of downtime now exceeds $300,000 ($5,000 per minute). For an IT department refreshing just 10 servers within 60 minutes, that cost of replacement would be $3 million. Linux on POWER has a 33% lower refresh cycle, which could save an IT shop $1 million or more in refresh costs.
Reliability and Recoverability
Linux on IBM POWER9 leverages unique underlying hardware and virtualization capabilities to provide a more secure, reliable and recoverable environment than x86. Linux workloads on POWER can take advantage of Power Systems Enterprise Pools, Capacity on Demand (CoD) and Live Partition Mobility (LPM) to deliver 24-7 availability. These POWER processor-specific features enable compute resources to be efficiently managed and rerouted based on changing business needs without incurring the cost or overheard of x86 disaster recovery implementations that require dedicated (yet often idle) compute resources.
All systems are at risk of security threats and implementation vulnerabilities. The IBM POWER processor minimizes these threats with the highest level of security in the industry by using the same security design principles with Linux on POWER as with IBM Z*. The POWER9 systems also use accelerated encryption built into the chip so that data is protected in motion and at rest.
PowerVM, the underlying, firmware-based virtualization layer that’s standard with POWER9 systems, has zero reported security vulnerabilities, according to the U.S. government’s National Vulnerability Database (NVD). VMware, a common hypervisor for Linux on x86, had 188 exposures reported on the NVD database over the last three years alone.
According to ITIC, in 20183, Linux on POWER users experienced a maximum of two minutes of unplanned downtime per server per year, or essentially 99.9996% uptime. Linux on x86 users experienced anywhere from 2.1 to 47 minutes of unplanned downtime per server, per year within the same time frame. This equates to as much as a 235% advantage for Linux on POWER in terms of unplanned downtime, or $235,000 in savings per server, per year3.
Ready Your Workloads for Hybrid and Multicloud
For cloud computing users, IBM Linux on POWER is leading the way for mission-critical applications on hybrid and multicloud environments with the IBM acquisition of Red Hat. Red Hat supercharges IBM’s Linux on POWER capabilities with the addition of the OpenShift* family of container software development and management tools. Red Hat’s recognition within the cloud and open-source communities has enabled IBM to provide integrated POWER processor-based cloud offerings and Cloud Paks* with notable cost savings.
An example is SAP HANA on IBM Power Systems virtualized in the IBM Cloud*. This Linux on POWER cloud solution provides the benefits of running mission-critical SAP HANA on POWER while tapping into the flexibility, reliability, security and performance advantages of POWER to reduce IT costs.
An IBM IT Economics cost analysis for a large managed IT service provider in Latin America found cumulative cost savings over five years of running SAP HANA on Linux on POWER versus Linux on x86. For this provider, the largest savings are due to significantly lower costs for networking, storage and compute hardware.
In a separate analysis, Forrester found that the average POWER user running SAP HANA on Linux on POWER could save $3.5 million over a three-year period compared to Linux on an alternative hardware platform such as x86.
The Top Contender
When making a platform selection to host Linux workloads, examine the technical and financial benefits of Power Systems. For many organizations, Linux on POWER is the top contender for the job.
1 Multiple benchmark sites redacted to a per core value are based on publicly available data including SPEC https://www.spec.org/ SAP https://www.sap.com/dmc/exp/2018-benchmark-directory/#/sd , IDC/QPI https://www.idc.com/about/qpi , IBM rPerf https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/K90RQOW8
2Space calculation assumes annual cost $260 per square foot and standard 42U rack occupying 9 square feet. Electrical load calculation assumes $0.15 cents per kWHr and PUE of 2.0.
3$235,000 annual savings assumes $5,000 per minute per downtime cost from 2019 ITIC survey
Post a Comment
Note: Comments are moderated and will not appear until approvedcomments powered by Disqus